{
  "id": 9317963,
  "title": "The GNOME LLM Policy That I Want",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/09/23/the-gnome-llm-policy-that-i-want",
  "topic": "ai",
  "section": "AI",
  "published": "2026-09-23T10:28:14.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Lobsters",
    "slug": "lobsters",
    "url": "https://blogs.gnome.org/alatiera/2026/09/23/the-gnome-llm-policy-that-i-want/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "A GNOME LLM policy has recently sparked controversy, with KDE proposing a formal stance on Artificial Intelligence. However, the author argues that such policies should focus on shaping social norms rather than micromanaging developer workflows. The goal is to signal desired behavior and reject undesirable actions, all while highlighting the humanist spirit of GNOME. The author explains that GNOME is not merely an ever-changing software project, but rather a collective community driven by joy and the pursuit of something greater than individual achievements. Contributors are valued as people, not mere labor for corporate entities.\n\nTo address the growing concerns around LLMs, the author suggests a GNOME LLM policy that prioritizes the social and human aspects of the project. While acknowledging the inevitable presence of LLM-generated code, the policy aims to make it clear that careless submissions are not welcomed. Drawing inspiration from the Foundation's shift towards individual donations, the author advocates for attracting a diverse group of contributors beyond corporate funding. Just as the community is built on strong social bonds, the success of GNOME should be measured by these connections and relationships developed along the way.",
  "summary": null,
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}