{
  "id": 7334757,
  "title": "Why is everyone suddenly worried about the risks of AI?",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/09/14/why-is-everyone-suddenly-worried-about-the-risks-of-ai",
  "topic": "ai",
  "section": "AI",
  "published": "2026-09-14T14:20:28.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "New Scientist",
    "slug": "new-scientist",
    "url": "https://www.newscientist.com/article/2589033-why-is-everyone-suddenly-worried-about-the-risks-of-ai/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Recent warnings have surfaced about the potential risks AI could pose to humanity. This comes from AI experts who claim that AI systems could wipe out the human race by the end of the decade. Jacob Coxon, an AI researcher who recently left Anthropic, has made these alarming claims. Anthropic's head of alignment science also shared his agreement, placing the probability of AI causing human extinction at over 10 percent. These warnings have sparked concerns worldwide, but are they justified? The history of AI has seen numerous claims of existential risk, often with contrasting perspectives. Some experts argue that AI is the best thing to happen to mathematics, while others express pessimism about its potential to cause catastrophic damage. Despite the controversy, some believe that the risks are real, yet unlikely. AI systems are increasingly integrated into critical systems like homes, cars, factories, and national infrastructure, so a malicious AI could disrupt these systems and cause significant problems. However, most experts consider the likelihood of such an event to be low.",
  "summary": "AI experts put the chance of models rising up and killing us all at greater than 10 per cent – but are the risks real? And can anything be done if they are?",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}