{
  "id": 7287290,
  "title": "Researchers probe how Democrats could win working-class voters",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/09/14/researchers-probe-how-democrats-could-win-working-class-voters",
  "topic": "business",
  "section": "Business",
  "published": "2026-09-14T09:10:21.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Semafor",
    "slug": "semafor",
    "url": "https://www.semafor.com/article/09/14/2026/researchers-probe-how-democrats-could-win-working-class-voters"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Researchers are investigating how Democrats could win over working-class voters, according to new data shared with Semafor. The Center for Working-Class Politics conducted a survey of 40,000 adults between April and June to determine the key factors that could help Democrats win more working-class voters without alienating their existing base.\n\nThe study found that economic populism is a crucial factor for working-class voters. However, a candidate's background cannot overshadow cultural concerns. Jared Abbott, the center's director, stated, \"It's better for you to say something that actually connects with those voters and that you agree with than to say nothing.\"\n\nSpecific policies that led to a decrease in support for Democrats among working-class voters included advocating for defunding the police (5.7 points), allowing transgender girls to participate in girls' sports (5.6 points), and supporting gun control (4 points). In contrast, economic populism resonated with these voters. The research suggests that Democrats should employ more populist rhetoric, run candidates who are seen as non-elite, and steer clear of progressive rhetoric, such as \"abolish ICE.\"",
  "summary": "A new survey of 40,000 adults suggests how Democrats could appeal to them.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}