{
  "id": 7240504,
  "title": "Raj Civic Poll Result: BJP vs Cong, who is winning?",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/09/14/raj-civic-poll-result-bjp-vs-cong-who-is-winning",
  "topic": "business",
  "section": "Business",
  "published": "2026-09-14T03:59:49.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "The Economic Times",
    "slug": "the-economic-times",
    "url": "https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/rajasthan-municipal-election-result-2026-live-bjp-vs-congress-who-is-winning-where/articleshow/134231813.cms"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "The results of Rajasthan's municipal elections, which took place on September 9 and 11, 2026, are still being counted. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is leading in four of the seven municipal corporations, while the Indian National Congress (Congress) is leading in three. The two parties are tied in Alwar, with both parties securing 4 out of the 7 wards in that corporation. In Jaipur, the BJP has secured 5 out of 7 wards, while Congress has 2. Jodhpur's Congress leads with 6, while BJP has 4. Pali and Bhilwara have BJP and Congress tied at 5 and 2 respectively. The elections covered 309 urban local bodies and 10,245 councillor seats across Rajasthan. The BJP had an advantage from uncontested seats, winning 44 of the 77 such seats, while Congress won 16 and independents won 17. The outcome of these elections is significant for both the ruling BJP government and the Congress party, as it will provide insights into the party's urban support base and organisational strength.",
  "summary": null,
  "key_points": [
    "BJP leads in four municipal corporations, Congress in three",
    "Tie in Alwar with both parties securing 4 out of 7 wards",
    "BJP advantage from uncontested seats, winning 44 of 77"
  ],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}