{
  "id": 5789655,
  "title": "Bucky Irving Fantasy Prediction 2026: An ADP of 45 Is Too Rich, Wait for the 70s",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/09/05/bucky-irving-fantasy-prediction-2026-an-adp-of-45-is-too-rich-wait",
  "topic": "culture",
  "section": "Culture",
  "published": "2026-09-05T15:06:00.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Yahoo Sports",
    "slug": "yahoo-sports",
    "url": "https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/bucky-irving-fantasy-prediction-2026-150600373.html"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "In the latest Bucky Irving fantasy prediction for 2026, it is suggested that the player's ADP of 45 is too high and waiting for his value to drop in the 70s range would be a better strategy. Irving's current fantasy projection is 11.9 points per game, but his ability to bounce back from injuries and compete with Kenneth Gainwell at the backfield may limit his upside. Among other running backs with similar ADPs in the mock draft simulator, Travis Etienne, Quinshon Judkins, D'Andre Swift, and David Montgomery are considered more valuable options. However, if Irving is available in the 70s range, he could be a flex option for fantasy teams.",
  "summary": "Bucky Irving enters the 2026 season seeking to replicate his rookie successes and forget last year. Over the past decade, he is one of only four running backs to record at least 1,100 rushing yards and 40 catches in a rookie season, and if we get anything close to that version of him now that he’s healthy, his ADP is going to be off by multiple rounds.",
  "key_points": [
    "Bucky Irving's ADP of 45 is considered too high.",
    "Waiting for Irving's value to drop in the 70s range is suggested.",
    "Travis Etienne, Quinshon Judkins, D Andre Swift, and David Montgomery are better options."
  ],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}