{
  "id": 3986917,
  "title": "Wanted: A More Humble Fed",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/28/wanted-a-more-humble-fed",
  "topic": "finance",
  "section": "Finance & Markets",
  "published": "2026-08-28T14:51:24.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "The Big Picture",
    "slug": "the-big-picture",
    "url": "https://ritholtz.com/2026/08/wanted-a-more-humble-fed/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "The Fed's 2% inflation target is a prime example of institutional error, a common mistake made by large organizations like governments and financial institutions. This target, adopted by the Federal Reserve in 1996, traces its origins to a New Zealand politician's offhand remark in 1988. The number, seemingly arbitrary, has since become a cornerstone of monetary policy worldwide, despite little evidence supporting its optimality. Economists surveyed in 2022, in fact, showed little consensus on the ideal target, with more than half preferring to maintain the current 2%. The post-pandemic era, following a century's worth of pandemics and the largest fiscal stimulus since World War II, has further complicated matters, yet the Fed has stubbornly maintained the original target. This refusal to adapt to new circumstances is a quintessential case of institutional error, akin to an individual doubling down on a bad trade. The sooner the Fed unwinds this mistake, the better the global economy will fare.",
  "summary": "My professional focus has been identifying and trying to correct the common behavioral errors we all make as investors. One cannot help but notice how similar mistakes are made by these large collections of people operating within large organizations. It is a side effect of observing markets and the economy: giant institutions making… Read More The post Wanted: A More Humble Fed appeared first on…",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}