{
  "id": 3600911,
  "title": "Review: Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold just barely keeps up",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/26/review-googles-pixel-11-pro-fold-just-barely-keeps-up",
  "topic": "tech",
  "section": "Tech",
  "published": "2026-08-26T21:40:00.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "9to5Google",
    "slug": "9to5google",
    "url": "https://9to5google.com/2026/08/26/google-pixel-11-pro-fold-review/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "The foldable market has seen significant improvements in hardware and software over the past few years. In this regard, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold stands out as Google's effort to make the most of a challenging situation. The device aims to keep up with the competition, and it does just enough to capture attention, aside from a few shortcomings.\n\nThe Pixel 11 Pro Fold retains the same design as previous models, making minor revisions for year three. However, it is thinner, at 10.1mm when closed, marking Google's thinnest foldable to date. This improvement, though, is accompanied by an uneven profile due to one side being made thinner than the other, resulting in a noticeable ridge when opened. While this may appear visually odd, it does not pose any functional issues.\n\nIn terms of build quality, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold looks and feels premium. The metal frame feels sturdy, and there are no creaks or croaks, a common problem in earlier generations. Google's refinement of this form factor is evident, as the outer display experience has significantly improved compared to the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The \"Olive\" color is subtle yet appealing.\n\nGoogle emphasizes the durability of the Pixel 11 Pro Fold, maintaining its IP68 dust/water resistance rating and an improved hinge that feels smooth and responsive. The ceramic outer display covering and \"glass fiber composite\" around the back have also proven durable, with no scuffs or scratches observed. However, the long-term durability of the backing material remains a concern, as it is advertised as highly resistant to scratches.\n\nDespite Google's claims on durability, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold still has structural flaws that could hinder its performance. These flaws are likely to go unnoticed by the average user but should be addressed to solidify the device's reputation for strength. The refinements made by Google are commendable but not enough to differentiate the Pixel 11 Pro Fold from the competition. Other foldable brands have made significant strides in eliminating noticeable flaws, making the Pixel 11 Pro Fold a hard sell for those who had issues with prior generations.\n\nOne aspect that falls short is the limited functionality of the HiLight feature, which is restricted to a single color and a meaningless Gemini status light. The outer display has also undergone improvements, with a larger 6.5-inch edge-to-edge display that is mostly bezel-free. The display is bright enough for outdoor use and offers a good viewing experience. Additionally, the placement of the inner display selfie camera off to the corner is more suitable for media consumption than the middle placement seen in Samsung's foldables.\n\nHowever, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold's display is not without its flaws, as the crease remains an issue. While it is usable and not distracting during usage, Google should strive for further improvements to stay competitive. Foldables are primarily designed for productivity, and Google has adopted a balanced approach to address this purpose.",
  "summary": "The foldable market has been moving fast, with hardware and software we saw just a few years ago having been completely rethought and drastically improved. In the middle of it all, the Pixel 11 Pro Fold feels like a concerted effort to make the best of a tough situation – Google’s new foldable tries its darndest to keep up with the competition, and it does just enough to deserve your attention,…",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}