{
  "id": 2883268,
  "title": "What does PFF think of the Vikings' secondary in 2026?",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/23/what-does-pff-think-of-the-vikings-secondary-in-2026",
  "topic": "culture",
  "section": "Culture",
  "published": "2026-08-23T22:31:51.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Yahoo Sports",
    "slug": "yahoo-sports",
    "url": "https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/does-pff-think-vikings-secondary-223151127.html"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "The Minnesota Vikings' defense has been regarded as one of the NFL's best units for several years, with Brian Flores' strategic mind playing a significant role. However, with a new roster of younger players stepping up in recent years, it is intriguing to see how the Minnesota Vikings' secondary performed in 2026 according to Pro Football Focus (PFF).\n\nPFF ranked the Vikings' secondary 22nd in the league for the 2026 season, citing concerns surrounding the team's overall performance. The report highlighted that Minnesota's secondary only broke up 14 passes all season, the fewest in the league. This was a significant drop from previous years when the defense had been consistently strong.\n\nOne bright spot for the Vikings' secondary in 2026 was the addition of James Pierre, who signed for just over $4 million per year. Pierre led the entire league with an 88.9 PFF coverage grade last season, making him a potentially valuable asset for the team. However, the report also pointed out that Byron Murphy Jr., who has been with the Vikings since 2023, had a 59.8 PFF coverage grade last season, a slight decline from previous years.\n\nGiven the importance of the cornerback position, the report concluded that the overall performance of the Vikings' secondary would be critical to their success in 2026. If the team performs like a 22nd-ranked unit, they are likely to struggle. Fans and analysts will be watching closely to see how the Vikings' secondary fares in the upcoming season.",
  "summary": "PFF ranked every secondary in the NFL and the Vikings did not finish very high.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}