{
  "id": 220672,
  "title": "Best Android Charger: Wireless, Portable, Cable (2026)",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/06/best-android-charger-wireless-portable-cable-2026",
  "topic": "tech",
  "section": "Tech",
  "published": "2026-08-06T11:34:00.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Wired",
    "slug": "wired",
    "url": "https://www.wired.com/story/best-android-charger/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "In the modern world of smartphones, there is no longer a need for various charging cables as most devices utilize USB-C ports. USB-C Power Delivery charging standard enables fast charging through higher voltage and wattage, compatible with multiple smartphone ecosystems including iPhone.\n\nThis article highlights several top-notch charging options. A wall charger capable of delivering up to 45 watts can rapidly charge most Android smartphones. However, some advanced Android devices may require speeds of 60 or even 100 watts, but this charger should suffice for general use. Its foldable prongs and included 6-foot USB-C cable are notable features.\n\nFor those who need more capacity, a power bank with a 25,000-mAh capacity is recommended. It can charge a smartphone multiple times and also power a laptop and tablet. This model boasts a built-in display and multiple USB-C ports, allowing simultaneous charging of up to four devices.\n\nAnother option is a Qi2 power bank, which functions like MagSafe for Android devices. While not all Android phones are Qi2 compatible, most will work with this power bank, albeit at a slightly slower charging rate of around 15 watts. This charger includes a kickstand, a built-in display, a two-way USB-C port, and comes in various colors.",
  "summary": "Whether you’re charging overnight at home or on the go, these are the fastest, most dependable Android chargers we’ve tested.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}