{
  "id": 20050231,
  "title": "Unwavering cooperators make group efforts easier to start but harder to sustain",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/11/14/unwavering-cooperators-make-group-efforts-easier-to-start-but-harder",
  "topic": "health",
  "section": "Health & Medicine",
  "published": "2026-11-14T21:00:45.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "PsyPost",
    "slug": "psypost",
    "url": "https://www.psypost.org/unwavering-cooperators-make-group-efforts-easier-to-start-but-harder-to-sustain/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "A small group of individuals who always cooperate can make it easier for a larger group to begin a shared effort, but their consistency may also lead others to become less engaged over time, according to a new mathematical modeling study. Unwavering cooperators act as a double-edged sword in group tasks, helping to spark collective action while simultaneously reducing overall participation once coordination takes place. These committed minority players can help launch group efforts but may also encourage free-riders who benefit from shared rewards without contributing any work themselves. Researchers from Yunnan University of Finance and Economics in China and Kyushu University in Japan used mathematical equations and computer simulations to study how committed minorities impact multiplayer coordination dilemmas, where success depends on a minimum number of players contributing.",
  "summary": "Every group effort seems to benefit from a few people who always pitch in. A new mathematical model suggests those reliable contributors make collective action easier to start, but can also give everyone else an excuse to coast.",
  "key_points": [
    "Unwavering cooperators aid group efforts initiation",
    "Consistency may reduce overall participation",
    "Study uses equations and simulations"
  ],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}