{
  "id": 18880610,
  "title": "It won on the steady sellers and lost on the rest",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/11/08/it-won-on-the-steady-sellers-and-lost-on-the-rest",
  "topic": "tech",
  "section": "Tech",
  "published": "2026-11-08T06:33:02.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Dev.to",
    "slug": "dev-to",
    "url": "https://dev.to/mashiah/it-won-on-the-steady-sellers-and-lost-on-the-rest-32ij"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "A Walmart store's machine-learning forecast proved 3.9% worse than a 28-day moving average on average error, incorrectly performing better on 58% of the 823 items. This disparity emerged due to the model's superior performance on steady sellers and poor performance on intermittent and lumpy items, which make up most of the store's inventory. The usual method for selecting a forecast based solely on the smallest error number can lead to incorrect choices for most of the catalogue. Utilizing forelint, an open-source library for auditing forecast backtests, this analysis demonstrated that the moving average was the better choice for 77% of the store's items, particularly the intermittent and lumpy ones. This insight highlights the importance of considering demand class when selecting forecasts, rather than relying on a single model for all items.",
  "summary": "On one Walmart store, a machine-learning forecast was 3.9 percent worse than a 28-day moving average on absolute error, and the worse forecast for 58 percent of the 823 items. Split by demand class, the result is two opposite ones: it wins on the steady sellers and loses by about 10 percent on the intermittent and lumpy items, which are most of the store. The usual way to choose a forecast is to…",
  "key_points": [
    "Walmart's machine-learning forecast performed 3.9% worse than 28-day moving average on average error",
    "Model excelled on steady sellers but struggled with intermittent and lumpy items",
    "Moving average outperformed model for 77% of the store's items"
  ],
  "editors_take": "Relying on a single error metric masks significant failures in managing intermittent inventory, forcing retailers to adopt demand-class specific forecasting strategies to avoid widespread inaccuracies across their catalogues.",
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}