{
  "id": 1805465,
  "title": "XOP vs TAN: Will an Oil & Gas ETF Bring More Profits Than a Solar Fund in 2026?",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/18/xop-vs-tan-will-an-oil-gas-etf-bring-more-profits-than-a-solar-fund",
  "topic": "finance",
  "section": "Finance & Markets",
  "published": "2026-08-18T21:13:53.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Motley Fool",
    "slug": "motley-fool",
    "url": "https://www.fool.com/coverage/etfs/2026/08/18/xop-vs-tan-will-an-oil-and-gas-etf-bring-more-profits-than-a-solar-fund-in-2026/?source=iedfolrf0000001"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) are two distinct mutual funds representing different segments of the energy industry. XOP focuses on traditional energy, tracking companies involved in oil and gas exploration and production. On the other hand, TAN concentrates on the renewable energy sector, specifically solar power manufacturing and deployment. The choice between these two funds largely hinges on an investor's perspective on energy transition timing and their risk appetite.\n\nBeta, a measure of price volatility in relation to the S&P 500, is calculated using monthly returns over a period of up to five years. It serves as a snapshot of how the fund's price may fluctuate compared to the broader market. The one-year return represents the total return earned by the fund over the past 12 months, providing insight into its performance during that period. Additionally, the dividend yield, which is the trailing-12-month distribution yield as of August 13, can be an attractive feature for income-seeking investors.\n\nInvestors must weigh these factors and consider their own financial goals and risk tolerance when deciding whether to invest in XOP or TAN. While XOP may appeal to those with a more conservative outlook on energy, TAN could be more appealing to those who are comfortable with higher volatility in pursuit of potential gains. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of the funds' characteristics and the investor's individual circumstances will guide the decision-making process.",
  "summary": "XOP's 0.35% expense ratio and lower volatility appeal to conservative investors, while TAN's 1.41 beta offers higher conviction exposure to renewable energy.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 2,
    "also_reported_by": [
      {
        "outlet": "Nasdaq Markets",
        "title": "XOP vs TAN: Will an Oil & Gas ETF Bring More Profits Than a Solar Fund in 2026?",
        "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/18/xop-vs-tan-will-an-oil-gas-etf-bring-more-profits-than-a-solar-fund-1807311",
        "published": "2026-08-18T21:33:53.000Z"
      }
    ]
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}