{
  "id": 17431764,
  "title": "NPP’s suit on presidential term limits needless – Inusah Fuseini",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/31/npps-suit-on-presidential-term-limits-needless-inusah-fuseini",
  "topic": "culture",
  "section": "Culture",
  "published": "2026-10-31T16:01:29.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Adom Online",
    "slug": "adom-online",
    "url": "https://www.adomonline.com/npps-suit-on-presidential-term-limits-needless-inusah-fuseini/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Former Member of Parliament for Tamale Central, Inusah Fuseini, argues that the NPP does not require the Supreme Court to clarify constitutional provisions on presidential term limits. He asserts that Article 66(2) of the 1992 Constitution already makes it clear that a person is limited to two terms as President, without distinguishing between consecutive or non-consecutive terms. Fuseini contends that the clause aims to restrict the number of times a person can be elected, not to regulate the time they should spend out of office before running again. He compares the presidency to Parliament, pointing out that there is no limit on how often an MP can seek re-election, as evidenced by his own tenure of more than four terms. Fuseini emphasizes the clarity of the Constitution, stating that the framers were explicit about their intention to impose term limits. He questions the Supreme Court's involvement, arguing that it lacks speculative jurisdiction and cannot predict future actions. Fuseini also highlights the potential waste of public resources on a hypothetical case and stresses that there must be a genuine constitutional issue for the court to address. The NPP has filed a lawsuit against the Attorney-General, requesting the Supreme Court to interpret Articles 58(2), 66(1), (2) and (3)(a), affirming a limit on consecutive or non-consecutive presidential terms.",
  "summary": "Former Member of Parliament for Tamale Central, Inusah Fuseini says the NPP does not need to ask the Supreme Court to interpret the constitutional provisions on presidential term limits, because the 1992 Constitution is already clear. Mr Fuseini, a lawyer, told Channel One TV that Article 66(2) limits a person to two terms as President. […]",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 2,
    "also_reported_by": [
      {
        "outlet": "MyJoyOnline Ghana",
        "title": "Inusah Fuseini urges Mahama to reject 3rd term bid even if Supreme Court allows it",
        "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/31/inusah-fuseini-urges-mahama-to-reject-3rd-term-bid-even-if-supreme",
        "published": "2026-10-31T15:24:57.000Z"
      }
    ]
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}