{
  "id": 1680669,
  "title": "How to Configure Parallel Execution in TestNG vs. Custom Excel Allocator",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/18/how-to-configure-parallel-execution-in-testng-vs-custom-excel",
  "topic": "tech",
  "section": "Tech",
  "published": "2026-08-18T09:23:32.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Dev.to",
    "slug": "dev-to",
    "url": "https://dev.to/shell_qa/how-to-configure-parallel-execution-in-testng-vs-custom-excel-allocator-4lo2"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Maintaining rapid test execution cycles is vital for maintaining streamlined build pipelines. Two viable methods for achieving full parallel test execution are native TestNG parallelization and a custom Excel Allocator. This report outlines the steps and trade-offs for each approach to assist in selecting the optimal strategy.\n\nFor native TestNG parallelization, adjustments are made directly within the testng_regression.xml configuration file. The \"parallel\" attribute set to \"methods\", along with a thread pool size of 10, enables concurrent execution of test methods. This configuration can be further customized through the Maven Surefire Plugin in pom.xml, allowing developers and CI systems to override settings without altering the XML files. To initiate full parallel execution matching the CPU core count, specific Maven parameters are passed during execution.\n\nConversely, a custom Allocator and Run Manager approach is recommended for Excel-driven frameworks where test scenarios are parsed from spreadsheets. This method involves an ExecutorService thread pool managed by a custom ExecutorService. Tests are executed based on active rows within an Excel sheet, with each thread pool configured according to target-specific properties. Execution is triggered through `mvn clean test -P runAllocator`, allowing for efficient scheduling and execution based on data-driven inputs.\n\nWhile native TestNG parallelization offers a streamlined, code-centric solution with reduced overhead, the Allocator and Run Manager approach provides greater flexibility for data-intensive, multi-sheet testing scenarios. The choice between the two should be guided by the specific needs of the project—favoring native TestNG for straightforward, code-first implementations or the Allocator for data-driven, Excel-integrated workflows.",
  "summary": "Optimizing test execution speed is essential for keeping build pipelines lean. Depending on how your framework is structured, you can achieve full parallel execution either natively using TestNG ** or dynamically using a **Custom Excel Allocator . Here is a step-by-step guide on configuring both approaches, along with a comparison to help you choose the right strategy. Strategy 1: Native TestNG…",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}