{
  "id": 16707230,
  "title": "Alleged 24-Core Intel Nova Lake-S And Performance Metrics Leaks",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/27/alleged-24-core-intel-nova-lake-s-and-performance-metrics-leaks",
  "topic": "tech",
  "section": "Tech",
  "published": "2026-10-27T03:48:34.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Lowyat.NET",
    "slug": "lowyat-net",
    "url": "https://www.lowyat.net/2026/408489/alleged-24-core-intel-nova-lake-s-and-performance-metrics-leaks/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "A new leak of the alleged 24-core Intel Nova Lake-S desktop CPU has surfaced in PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1. The processor, listed under the generic \"Intel 0000\" name, was reportedly submitted in September. Single-thread metrics achieved 5,210 points, surpassing both the current Core Ultra 9 285K (5,191 points) and AMD's Ryzen 9950X3D (4,805 points). In multi-threaded tests, the 24-core Nova Lake-S scored 61,509 points, outperforming the Core i9-14900K (58,074 points). This marks the first time any metrics from the alleged SKU have been revealed, with Intel reportedly planning five CPU packages at launch. The 24-core model will feature an 18A process, Xe3 integrated graphics, a new LGA1954 socket, NPU 6-core support, DDR5 memory speeds of up to 8,000MT/s, and a substantial L2 and L3 combined cache of up to 144MB. The P-Cores and E-Cores will be named Coyote Cove and Arctic Wolf, respectively.",
  "summary": "A new leak, allegedly of the 24-core Intel Nova Lake-S desktop CPU, was recently discovered in the PassMark PerformanceTest 11.1. The allege Core Ultra 4000 Series processor was listed under the generic “Intel 0000) name, and was reportedly submitted all the way back in September this year. One benchmark details that comes to light in […] The post Alleged 24-Core Intel Nova Lake-S And Performance…",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}