{
  "id": 16104342,
  "title": "MLPX vs EMLP: Which Energy Infrastructure ETF Offers Better Yield?",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/22/mlpx-vs-emlp-which-energy-infrastructure-etf-offers-better-yield",
  "topic": "finance",
  "section": "Finance & Markets",
  "published": "2026-10-22T20:55:01.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Motley Fool",
    "slug": "motley-fool",
    "url": "https://www.fool.com/coverage/etfs/2026/10/22/mlpx-vs-emlp-which-energy-infrastructure-etf-offers-better-yield/?source=iedfolrf0000001"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "When evaluating energy infrastructure ETFs, two prominent options stand out: the Global X-MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and the First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). MLPX provides a low-cost, pure-play energy infrastructure strategy, while EMLP offers a diversified mix of utilities and energy infrastructure at a higher price.\n\nEnergy infrastructure is a vital component for income-focused investors seeking yield from physical assets. This comparison focuses on the index-based approach of MLPX versus EMLP's more diversified strategy, exploring how their differing sector weights and fee structures affect total return and income potential.\n\nBeta, a measure of price volatility relative to the S&P 500, is calculated from monthly returns over the fund's history (up to five years). MLPX has a beta of 1.22, indicating slightly higher volatility than the market, while EMLP's beta is 1.04, showing somewhat lower volatility. Over the past year, MLPX has delivered a total return of 23.9%, while EMLP has returned 10.4%.\n\nBoth ETFs have different expense ratios, with MLPX charging 0.45% compared to EMLP's 0.95%. MLPX also offers a higher dividend yield, paying $3.07 per share over the trailing 12 months, which amounts to a 4.2% yield on its recent ~$71.27 share price. In contrast, EMLP has paid $1.23 per share over the trailing 12 months, yielding 2.9% on its ~$42.46 share price.\n\nMLPX is more affordable for long-term investors, while EMLP provides broader sector exposure with 49% in utilities, 46% in energy, and 4% in industrials. EMLP holds 58 positions, with major holdings in Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD), Energy Transfer LP (ET), and MPLX LP (MPLX). MLPX, on the other hand, is more concentrated, with 100% exposure to the energy sector and 29 holdings, including Williams Cos. Inc. (WMB), TC Energy Corp (TRP), and Enbridge Inc (ENB).\n\nOverall, MLPX has outperformed EMLP over the past three, five, and ten years, making it the preferred choice for most investors in terms of performance. However, EMLP's lower expense ratio and diversified mix could be attractive for income seekers seeking a more balanced approach.",
  "summary": "MLPX's lower fees and pure energy focus have delivered stronger returns, but EMLP's utility diversification appeals to risk-averse income investors.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 2,
    "also_reported_by": [
      {
        "outlet": "Nasdaq Markets",
        "title": "MLPX vs EMLP: Which Energy Infrastructure ETF Offers Better Yield?",
        "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/22/mlpx-vs-emlp-which-energy-infrastructure-etf-offers-better-yield-16112689",
        "published": "2026-10-22T21:15:01.000Z"
      }
    ]
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}