{
  "id": 14773210,
  "title": "AI coding has a decision fatigue problem. Here’s how we’re fixing it.",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/15/ai-coding-has-a-decision-fatigue-problem-heres-how-were-fixing-it",
  "topic": "ai",
  "section": "AI",
  "published": "2026-10-15T19:35:36.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Dev.to",
    "slug": "dev-to",
    "url": "https://dev.to/mm_can_ecd97f8f75a2d93e/ai-coding-has-a-decision-fatigue-problem-heres-how-were-fixing-it-42j9"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "AI coding can lead to decision fatigue, as users find themselves dealing with numerous small decisions while working with AI agents. These decisions include phrasing requests, determining how to interact with the tool, evaluating the output, and deciding whether to accept or retry. This process, which occurs repeatedly, can be draining. To address this issue, a tool called Fade has been developed.\n\nFade operates in the terminal and features a single conversation between two agents. One agent engages in planning and discussion, while the other writes code in a sidebar. The user simply provides the desired outcome, and Fade takes care of the rest, eliminating the need to make numerous decisions.\n\nUnlike traditional AI coding tools, Fade only asks questions that only the user can answer, while handling all other tasks. The Builder writes code in real-time, allowing the conversation to remain open and uninterrupted. Fade also generates proofs for each claim made by the Builder, usually in the form of focused tests or commands. These proofs are committed and then run by Fade itself, ensuring accuracy before the user even sees the results.\n\nCertain aspects, such as whether a screen feels calmer or if the wording sounds friendly, cannot be tested and are left to the user's discretion. Fade asks these questions directly, waiting for the user's response. Clear requests are immediately executed, providing a one-line read-back to confirm understanding. If a request is vague, Fade asks a single question with concrete options, eliminating the back-and-forth.\n\nEvery change made by Fade is a git commit, allowing users to easily revert any modifications if needed. A short session might involve adding search functionality to notes, with Fade handling the rest. The user then provides input on the desired tone for the help text, and Fade executes the change accordingly.\n\nFade commits each change to Git, enabling clean undo functionality that reverts the change if necessary. A session might involve adding search to notes, with the Builder working while the user continues to communicate with Fade. Questions arise, such as what tags would be appropriate, and Fade provides the solution.\n\nUsers can type questions like \"What would tags look like?\" and Fade responds with the necessary actions. In one example, the user agrees to add tags to notes, and Fade proceeds accordingly.\n\nWhile Fade is currently in version 0.5, it demonstrates promise in reducing decision fatigue for AI coding tasks. It relies on a stronger model for conversation and a less powerful model for code generation, with the intention of optimizing performance. The tool is MIT licensed and available on GitHub at https://github.com/muzaffermahi/Fade.",
  "summary": "After a few hours of coding with an AI agent, I'm usually more worn out than after a day of writing code myself. For a while I blamed the waiting. Then I started paying attention to what I was actually doing during those hours, and most of it was making small decisions the tool kept handing back to me. A normal turn with a coding agent goes something like this. I figure out how to phrase the…",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}