{
  "id": 1451569,
  "title": "Supreme Court halts HC proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in disproportionate assets case",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/08/17/supreme-court-halts-hc-proceedings-against-rahul-gandhi-in",
  "topic": "world",
  "section": "World",
  "published": "2026-08-17T08:44:49.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "The Hindu",
    "slug": "the-hindu",
    "url": "https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-halts-hc-proceedings-against-rahul-gandhi-in-disproportionate-assets-case/article71355349.ece"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "The Supreme Court issued an immediate injunction on Monday, August 17, 2026, to halt disproportionate assets proceedings initiated by the Allahabad High Court against Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi. A three-judge Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, responded to arguments from senior advocate Kapil Sibal and advocate Prasanna S. representing Mr. Gandhi. They contended that the High Court's actions against Mr. Gandhi amounted to a \"witch-hunt\" and violated principles of natural justice. The High Court was set to hear the case on August 20. Mr. Sibal pointed out that the proceedings were conducted in-chamber, with records kept in sealed covers and Mr. Gandhi not given a chance to present his defense. Chief Justice Kant addressed the CBI counsel, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, regarding the court's obligations under natural justice principles. Mr. Raju acknowledged that the facts in Mr. Shishir's complaint could be correct or incorrect, but highlighted the \"serious nature\" of the allegations. Justice Joymalya Bagchi questioned the CBI's lack of prior inquiry and emphasized the court's responsibility to examine the validity of the High Court's order. The Supreme Court also requested the Gandhi side to share the case file with Mr. Shishir, who appeared on caveat. Mr. Gandhi criticized the proceedings as unjustified secrecy in-chamber hearings, absence of foundational material, and the lack of reasons provided by the High Court for directing the inquiry. He challenged Mr. Shishir's locus standi, stating the Opposition Leader had faced character attacks and civil rights violations due to the High Court's actions.",
  "summary": "“If the courts want to issue directions [for inquiry/investigation], the courts are expected to fulfill the principles of natural justice,” Chief Justice Kant addressed the CBI counsel, Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju.",
  "key_points": [
    "Supreme Court issues injunction to halt proceedings against Rahul Gandhi.",
    "High Court's actions deemed as witch-hunt violating natural justice.",
    "Gandhi's defense denied, case file shared with Mr. Shishir."
  ],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}