{
  "id": 12854384,
  "title": "How the Polls Could Be Wrong Again",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/08/how-the-polls-could-be-wrong-again",
  "topic": "world",
  "section": "World",
  "published": "2026-10-08T11:15:00.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "The Atlantic",
    "slug": "the-atlantic",
    "url": "https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/10/midterm-polls-error/688922/"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "As Election Day approaches, polls indicate a significant Democratic victory. According to Nate Silver's polling average, Democratic Senate candidates are leading in several states where Trump won by a large margin in 2024, while Democrats are expected to take their biggest House majority in 18 years. Pollsters have been striving to regain the public's trust following their underestimation of Trump in 2016, adjusting their methodologies in various ways. However, past efforts have not been entirely successful.\n\nAfter the 2016 election, pollsters acknowledged their failure to account for educational polarization, where college-educated voters have distinct political views compared to non-college-educated voters. They attempted to include more non-college-educated respondents or weight their responses to match their share of the electorate. This approach seemed to work in 2018, but not in 2020, when the polls underestimated Trump's support, particularly at the state level.\n\nTo address this issue, pollsters employed a method called \"recalled vote,\" asking respondents if they had voted for Trump previously and then adjusting the sample based on that information. Although this method worked in 2022, it did not yield accurate results in 2024, when polls underestimated Trump's support by nearly 3 percent.\n\nPollsters have since turned to more complex solutions, such as precinct-level modeling and statistical adjustments based on factors like the sound of a respondent's name and their car preferences. They have also developed new techniques like \"support score\" and \"energy balancing\" to better account for demographic similarities between respondents and the general population.\n\nDespite these efforts, predicting voter turnout remains a significant challenge. Accurate turnout models can greatly impact election outcomes, as seen in a YouGov poll where Democrats led registered voters by six percentage points but led by 16 points among likely voters. However, even the pollsters themselves caution that such results may be overly optimistic due to the inherent uncertainty in predicting voter turnout.",
  "summary": "Democrats appear headed toward a big victory. But a small polling error could mean a dramatically different outcome.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}