{
  "id": 12682682,
  "title": "Build a RAG Evaluation Set Before You Ship Your AI Feature",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/07/build-a-rag-evaluation-set-before-you-ship-your-ai-feature",
  "topic": "ai",
  "section": "AI",
  "published": "2026-10-07T18:20:16.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Dev.to",
    "slug": "dev-to",
    "url": "https://dev.to/geminate_solutions_9b6035/build-a-rag-evaluation-set-before-you-ship-your-ai-feature-380i"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Before shipping a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) feature, it is crucial to create an evaluation set. This set should consist of 50 to 100 real questions, each with an expected answer and the source document that should support it. To ensure the evaluation is accurate, retrieval and answer quality should be scored separately, and the set should be run on every change made to chunking, embeddings, prompts, or models. Neglecting this evaluation process can lead to hidden regressions until a customer discovers them.\n\nMost RAG features are currently tested by someone typing known questions. However, an evaluation set fixes this issue by providing a stable, honest, and informative set of questions. The evaluation set should be collected from real sources such as support tickets, sales call notes, internal channels, search logs, and beta users. Aim for a mix of simple lookups, combined document questions, varied question phrasing, and unanswerable cases. Document questions in a JSONL file, including the question, expected answer, source IDs, key facts the answer must contain, and whether the question is answerable.\n\nOnce the evaluation set is ready, score retrieval and answer quality separately. Retrieval metrics such as hit rate @k, recall @k, and mean reciprocal rank (MRR) can be calculated without the need for an LLM. Answer metrics like fact coverage, faithfulness, and refusal correctness should be assessed, with the latter determining if the system declines appropriately for unanswerable questions. By analyzing both retrieval and answer metrics, teams can determine what needs to be fixed, whether it's the retrieval process, the model, or the context formatting. This evaluation process is essential for ensuring that RAG features function accurately and reliably before being released to users.",
  "summary": "Build a small evaluation set before you ship a RAG feature. That means 50 to 100 real questions, each with an expected answer and the source document that should support it. Score retrieval and answer quality separately, and run the set on every change to chunking, embeddings, prompts or models. Without it, every tweak is a guess. You change the chunk size and try three questions in a playground.…",
  "key_points": [
    "Create evaluation set with 50-100 real questions and expected answers.",
    "Score retrieval and answer quality separately for accurate assessment.",
    "Collect questions from real sources like support tickets and beta users."
  ],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}