{
  "id": 12457022,
  "title": "같은 AI 쓰는데 해킹 공격이 더 빠른 이유…‘AI 대 AI’ 창과 방패의 딜레마",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/06/ai-ai-ai",
  "topic": "ai",
  "section": "AI",
  "published": "2026-10-06T18:02:18.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Hankyoreh",
    "slug": "hankyoreh",
    "url": "https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/it/1281225.html"
  },
  "original_language": "ko",
  "account": "As cyber attacks utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) intensify, concerns have arisen regarding whether the cybersecurity frameworks are being compromised. In the midst of AI being actively used for cyber defense, experts have noted a \"structural time gap\" between attackers exploiting vulnerabilities and defenders repairing them. According to the Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) statistics, the number of domestic breach reports nearly doubled from 1277 in 2023 to 2383 in 2022. In the first half of this year, the number of reports remains at 1236, similar to the total number reported in 2023. While these statistics do not classify AI usage, experts predict that this trend will only intensify as AI becomes more prevalent in cyber attacks. The speed at which vulnerabilities are identified and exploited through AI, coupled with the need for defenders to verify system stability and validate patches, creates a \"time gap\" that further burdens cybersecurity efforts. As AI is increasingly employed in cyber defense, techniques are evolving to utilize AI for vulnerability discovery, fixing, validation, and attack detection. Major security platforms like Microsoft's Defender XDR analyze threat signals from PCs, servers, and accounts using AI to block compromised devices and limit attack spread. Enterprises like OpenAI and Anthropic offer AI-specialized models to aid in vulnerability discovery, patch creation, and defense overall. However, the fundamental challenge remains that attackers and defenders must clear different barriers in the AI \"sword and shield\" confrontation. Attackers can find multiple vulnerabilities, attempt attacks, and quickly switch to others if unsuccessful, while defenders must create patches or seek fixes from developers and validate system compatibility without disrupting services. This disparity in time and effort required for defense is a significant vulnerability gap.",
  "summary": null,
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 1,
    "also_reported_by": []
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}