{
  "id": 11606787,
  "title": "4 kawasan di Johor, Sarawak catat IPU tak sihat pagi ini",
  "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/03/4-kawasan-di-johor-sarawak-catat-ipu-tak-sihat-pagi-ini-11606787",
  "topic": "world",
  "section": "World",
  "published": "2026-10-03T04:24:00.000Z",
  "source": {
    "name": "Free Malaysia Today",
    "slug": "free-malaysia-today",
    "url": "https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/bahasa/tempatan/2026/10/03/4-kawasan-di-johor-sarawak-catat-ipu-tak-sihat-pagi-ini"
  },
  "original_language": "en",
  "account": "Selasa pagi ini, Empat kawasan di Johor dan Sarawak melaporkan bacaan Indeks Pencemar Udara (IPU) yang tidak sehat, menurut data Sistem Pengurusan Indeks Pencemar Udara Malaysia (APIMS) di Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS). Sarawak's Sri Aman recorded the highest reading of 152, followed by Johor's Pasir Gudang with 151. Serian in Sarawak and Larkin in Johor, also reported readings of 126 and 121 respectively.\n\nMeanwhile, 61 locations recorded IPU readings at a good level, while two locations were found to be in a healthy condition - Taiping in Perak with a reading of 44, and Temerloh in Pahang with a reading of 42. However, the reading for the Kota Kinabalu station in Sabah was not available at the time.\n\nReadings ranging from 0 to 50 are categorized as good, 51 to 100 (moderate), 101 to 200 (unhealthy), 201 to 300 (very unhealthy) and above 300 (dangerous.",
  "summary": "61 kawasan di seluruh negara catatkan bacaan IPU pada tahap sederhana, manakala dua kawasan pada tahap baik.",
  "key_points": [],
  "editors_take": null,
  "illustration": null,
  "coverage": {
    "outlets": 2,
    "also_reported_by": [
      {
        "outlet": "Free Malaysia Today",
        "title": "Adun Sarawak bantah cadangan kawasan pilihan raya baharu SPR",
        "url": "https://urgent.news/2026/10/01/adun-sarawak-bantah-cadangan-kawasan-pilihan-raya-baharu-spr",
        "published": "2026-10-01T13:10:15.000Z"
      }
    ]
  },
  "ai_generated": true,
  "disclaimer": "Summaries, key points and the editor’s take are written by software from other outlets’ reporting and may contain errors — always check the linked original."
}